Home Awesome Anthony Rendon and Alex Bregman Are the Same, and Also Different

Anthony Rendon and Alex Bregman Are the Same, and Also Different

168
0

If you watch enough baseball, players start to blend together in your brain. You know what I’m talking about — Corey Seager is injury-prone Carlos Correa. Ozzie Albies is caffeinated Jose Altuve( no small accomplishment, since Altuve is a Five Hour Energy spokesman ). Newly minted $100 million human Alex Bregman is Anthony Rendon with good hair. The Bregman/ Rendon comparing occurred to me even before I find Bregman play. A highly-drafted college third baseman with an excellent all-around game? More power than you’d guess despite a swinging that seems designed to set the ball in play? Probably a little better at baserunning than you’d expect, even if he isn’t a burner? Yeah, that pretty much coverings both guys.

Nothing Bregman has done since reaching the majors has changed this early comparison in my intellect. Between 2017( Bregman’s first full year in the bigs) and 2018, he’s recorded a 141 wRC+ to Rendon’s 140. Bregman has walked 11.3% of the time, Rendon 11.6%. Bregman has struck out 13.7% of the time to Rendon’s 13.6%. Bregman has a. 219 ISO; Rendon’s is. 230. Bregman has 50 home run; Rendon has 49.

You get the general idea — both players have been incredible, and both have done it in truly similar ways. Rendon has been worth 13 WAR over the past two years, second-best among third basemen. Bregman has been worth 11.1 WAR, good for fourth. Here’s another thing they have in common — the issue is both among the most extreme swing-rate changers from 2017 to 2018. Plot twist, though! It was in opposite directions. Bregman lessened his swaying rate by the third-most among qualified hitters, while Rendon increased his by the second-most. Yes, we’ve ultimately find a place where Anthony Rendon and Alex Bregman are different — extremely different.

For Alex Bregman, 2017 must have been a mix of gratification and annoyance. His 217 PA in 2016 depleted his rookie eligibility, and while he held his own in his first big league action( 114 wRC +), he seemed very much like someone struggling to adjust to big league pitching. He struck out in 24% of his plate appearances, light years higher than his 10% career minor league rate( and 7.5% college rate ). His swaying ten-strike rate was 11.8%, meaningfully above league median. In short, he didn’t look like the hitter scouts expected him to be.

2017 was a huge step in the right direction — a 15.5% strikeout rate probably still felt quite high to him, but made a lot more sense for someone with his talents. Still, though, Bregman’s full-season line fell short of his minor league numbers — he reached. 284/.352 /. 475, good for a 123 wRC+ and 3.5 WAR, a better than solid regular but not quite an All-Star. The Astros won the World Series, and it’s patently hard to beat that thrill, but Bregman likely felt like he hadn’t unlocked his full potential.

In 2018, Alex Bregman’s swing profile changed altogether. He ran from the 56 th-lowest Swaying% among qualified batters to the 5th-lowest, which isn’t a thing you do by half-measures. He swung 7.7% less overall. He swayed 8.6% less at fastballs and 6.7% less at secondary pitches. He swayed 5.8% less often at balls, 5.9% less often at strikes. He swayed 12% less often on the first pitching. About the only place where he didn’t lessen his swaying rate was with two strikes, where he actually swayed a touch more often( 58.2%) in 2018( the league median is a touch above 60% ). Why make this change? Some of it comes down to organizational doctrine. As making coach Dave Hudgens said in an interview in 2017, “I don’t want guys swaying at a pitch unless they can do injury. If you go in with that mind-set, you’re not going to miss your pitch as often.”

Pretty much every Astro has decreased their swing rate over day, though none to quite as striking a degree as Bregman. Why did the change assist him so much including with regard to? I can’t speak for Bregman, but I do have a hypothesi. See, Alex Bregman isn’t the biggest guy in the world. He needs to work for his power — he can’t merely Aaron Judge-it up there and make everything out. Where does that power come from? Well, in the center of the strike zone or inside, with a small splash of up and away 😛 TAGEND

That’s Alex Bregman’s slugging by zones in 2018, and that’s just common sense. One small problem, though. Here’s where Bregman swung in 2017 😛 TAGEND

Look, I’m no pattern scientist, but I can tell that’s not ideal. There are just too many sways in zones where he isn’t making that much power. Even worse, Bregman doesn’t sway and miss much, so he was building contact with those inside pitches, both high and low, and not doing much with them. The pitches off the inside edge are especially injury to persons who relies on get the barrel on the ball to hit for power. Here’s Bregman’s 2018 😛 TAGEND

Ahhhh, much better. Alex Bregman was swaying at too many pitchings, both balls and ten-strikes that weren’t in his preferred one of the purposes of the strike zone. He decided to be more selective and hunt a pitch to hit early in the count, and boy did it be paid for. There was an important auxiliary benefit as well. In 2017, Bregman watched a middle-of-the-pack 14.5% of his plate appearances reach a 2-0 counting( league average is about 14% ). In 2018, that climbed to 18.7%. 2017 Bregman got to a 3-1 counting 9.7% of the time. 2018 Bregman did it 14.4% of the time. What about 3-0 countings, that mythical Shangri-La of batting? Bregman was dead on league average in 2017, 4.6% of plate appearances, before find them 6.8% of the time in 2018. In all the cases, he went from middle-of-the-pack to one of the top 20 batters in baseball in terms of reaching those countings. Not only was Bregman swaying at better pitchings when he swung early in counts, he was reaching hitters’ counts more often. That’s a recipe for success.

Okay, the story of swinging less often and to be good at hitting is easy to tell. Admit it — when I got to the evidence backing up Bregman’s improvement, you switched to skimmed mode, looking for pictures and clever turns of phrase, because you didn’t need to see the proof. I get it — that one merely builds intuitive sense. Swinging markedly more, though? That’s not an adjustment I expected. And when I say swaying more, I actually do entail swinging more, by the route. Rendon swung at 7.3% more of the pitches he saw in 2018 than he did in 2017. He swung more at fastballs. He swung more at secondary pitches. He swayed more at pitchings in the zone, and he swayed more at pitches out of the zone. If you’re get an inverse Bregman vibe here, I’m with you. It’s gratifying that the answer isn’t as simple as “Oh Rendon just got better.” If he magically swung more at pitchings in the zone without increasing his chase rate, we’d merely chalk it up to going full Votto. If he started ambushing fastballs without swaying more at filthy curves, hey, good work , no further analysis necessary! Luckily, it’s not quite that simple.

Rendon didn’t show the same marked improvement in 2018 that Bregman did, but that’s largely because he was already great in 2017. He slashed a sensational. 308/.401 /. 533, good for a 141 wRC +, and his 6.7 WAR was a career high. There wasn’t much impetus to tap into more of his power, because he’d simply hit for a career-high ISO. Strike out less? He had a career-low strikeout rate in 2017. Walk more? You guessed it — a career-high stroll rate. Rendon didn’t need to change his batting approach to improve, because he was firing on all cylinders already. 2018, then, was more a narrative of Rendon adjusting to what pitchers threw him.

To wit: Rendon has always been a high-contact hitter, but he’s generally been a very patient hitter as well. In 2017, he was in the 10 th percentile among qualified hitters in terms of first-pitch swings. Despite this, pitchers were pretty careful with Rendon. They threw pitchings in the strike zone slightly more than league average and fastballs slightly more than league median, but basically treated him like an average batter. In 2018, pitchers pushed the envelope a little bit more. They upped the percentage of 0-0 pitches in the ten-strike zone from 55% to 58.5%. They upped the percentage of fastballs from 68.2% to 70.7%. Maybe batting Rendon earlier in the lineup changed how many ten-strikes he saw, though there’s not much evidence of that. Largely, pitchers seemed to merely try to steal a few more strikes against a patient but formidable hitter.

How did Rendon respond? Well, as I mentioned above, Rendon was in the 10 th percentile of 0-0 swingers in 2017. In 2018, he moved up to the 45 th percentile, raising his swaying rate by 9 %. Here’s the most obvious way to think about it: In 2017, if you hurl Rendon a first-pitch fastball in the strike zone, he swung 27.5% of the time. More than two thirds of the time, that’s a free strike. In 2018, he swung 45.5% of the time, a tremendous increase. That was bad news for the pitchers facing Rendon — his wOBA was a comical. 534 when he set the ball in play on these swings, with six doublings, a triple, and three home run in 35 outcomes. This targeted aggressivenes was definitely one of the purposes of Rendon’s plan for 2018, and it worked to perfection. Pitchers fed Rendon first-pitch hittable fastballs, and he feasted.

For the most part, this was a brilliant adjustment. The main downside of swaying more on the first pitch is more 0-1 countings, and Rendon is the exact kind of player to minimize that downside. He’s reached an 0-1 count 1675 periods in his career and compiled a 94 wRC+ in those plate appearances. If that voices uninspiring, well, MLB as a whole has put up a 65 wRC+ after 0-1 over that time frame. Rendon’s phenomenal contact rate keeps him alive in pitcher’s countings, and he took advantage of that fact in 2018 to look for more pitches to reach early in the count.

How did Rendon’s decision to swaying more on the first pitching pan off? Well, his wRC+ fell from a career-high 141 to … 140. His strikeout rate increased from a career-low 13.6% all the way to … 13.7%. His xwOBA actually rose, from. 378 to. 388. All of these numbers, by the style, vastly outstripped his projections. ZiPS had Rendon striking out 16.1% of the time on the path to a 119 wRC +, while Steamer pegged his K% at 16.3% and his wRC+ around 121. In short, Rendon beat the regression bug, and he did it by evolving. In 2019, Rendon projects to have a 127 wRC+ and a 15.2% strikeout rate. Can he make another adjustment to keep defying gravity? Merely period will tell.

So, there you have it. Alex Bregman and Anthony Rendon are almost an exact match at surface level. If you enhance, improve, enhance all the way down to the swing level, though, they’re nearly perfect opposites. Bregman picked a new approach to focus on his strengths. Rendon picked a new approach to take advantage of pitchers’ tendencies. The two approaches went in exactly opposite directions, and yet they were both right. Sometimes baseball is amazing.

var SERVER_DATA= Object.assign( SERVER_DATA || );

Read more: blogs.fangraphs.com

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here